Endangered Species Legislation Essay -- CITES, Endangered Species Act

The latter half of the ordinal century was host to the superlative and most widespread advancements in environmental awareness in military man history. It was during this time that people began to consider the effects of their polluting cars and their wasteful habits. People began to agnise that something must be d unrivaled to get all over humans negative impacts on their surroundings and thus the environmental performance was born. One of the most fundamental factors that resulted from this expansion of environmental consciousness occurring over the last several decades has been the tax shelter of endangered species. Much has been done in the legal world to visualize the continued longevity of our planets diversity, including two major policies CITES and the peril Species Act. Each of these policies has approached the welfare of endangered species in a different appearance, with change degrees of success. Each strategy will be summarized and analyzed, beginning with the CITES treaty, as it was enacted in the first place the imperil Species Act. However, before examining the function and effectiveness of each strategy, it is important to apprehend the history behind each one of them.In 1966, Congress passed the jeopardize Species Preservation Act, a piece of ordinance designed to provide express protection to a list of primaeval animal species. The Departments of Interior, Agriculture, and Defense were creditworthy for the protection of these species and the preservation of their habitats. It also dole out land to the U.S. look for and Wildlife work to help maintain these natural habitats. In 1969, the Act was amended because move on protection was necessary. With the threat of worldwide extinction, the amendment called for an internationalist meeting and cha... ...es rather than the officials that fight them, but all things considered, these two policies go a long way to improving the problem of human-caused extinction. Works CitedDoremus, Holly, and Joel E. Pagel. wherefore Listing May Be Forever Perspectives on Delisting Under the U.S. peril Species Act. saving Biology, Vol. 15, No. 5 (Oct. 2001) 1258-68.Hemley, Ginette. CITES How Useful a Tool For Wildlife Conservation? Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 23, No. 4, Changes and Challenges in the Wildlife Profession (Winter, 1995) 635-39.History and Evolution of the imperil Species Act of 1973, Including its Relationship to CITES. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1 May 2008. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2 Dec. 2008 .Reibstein, Rick. Endangered Species Act. CAS GE 521, Boston, MA. 19 Nov. 2008. Endangered Species Legislation Essay -- CITES, Endangered Species Act The latter half of the twentieth century was host to the greatest and most widespread advancements in environmental awareness in human history. It was during this time that people began to consider the effects of their polluting cars and their wasteful habits. People began to realize that something must be done to curb humans negative impacts on their surroundings and thus the environmental movement was born. One of the most important factors that resulted from this expansion of environmental consciousness occurring over the last several decades has been the protection of endangered species. Much has been done in the legal world to ensure the continued longevity of our planets diversity, including two major policies CITES and the Endangered Species Act. Each of these policies has approached the welfare of endangered species in a different way, with varying degrees of success. Each strategy will be summarized and analyzed, beginning with the CITES treaty, as it was enacted before the Endangered Species Act. However, before examining the function and effectiveness of each strategy, it is important to understand the history behind each one of them.In 1966, Congress passed the Endangered Species Preservation Act, a piece of legislation designed to pr ovide limited protection to a list of native animal species. The Departments of Interior, Agriculture, and Defense were responsible for the protection of these species and the preservation of their habitats. It also allotted land to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to help maintain these natural habitats. In 1969, the Act was amended because further protection was necessary. With the threat of worldwide extinction, the amendment called for an international meeting and cha... ...es rather than the officials that manage them, but all things considered, these two policies go a long way to improving the problem of human-caused extinction.Works CitedDoremus, Holly, and Joel E. Pagel. Why Listing May Be Forever Perspectives on Delisting Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology, Vol. 15, No. 5 (Oct. 2001) 1258-68.Hemley, Ginette. CITES How Useful a Tool For Wildlife Conservation? Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 23, No. 4, Changes and Challenges in the Wildlife Pro fession (Winter, 1995) 635-39.History and Evolution of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, Including its Relationship to CITES. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1 May 2008. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2 Dec. 2008 .Reibstein, Rick. Endangered Species Act. CAS GE 521, Boston, MA. 19 Nov. 2008.